“The Humanity We All Share”: What the DSM Leaves Out

In her ethnography of manic depression Bipolar Explorations: Mania and Depression in American Culture, anthropologist Emily Martin notes that in the various support groups in which she participated for her study, people used the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) categories to talk about their illnesses rather than talking about their inner psychic states. Martin, herself “living under the description of bipolar,” realizes that while she has had years of regular one-on-one conversations with psychiatrists and social workers who taught her to recognize and describe the nuances of her psychological experiences, the people in the support groups have not. Most insurance does not pay for long-term psychotherapy and most people do not have the resources to pay for it privately. Deprived of the opportunity to explore their inner psychic states, the people she encountered in the support groups had only the language and categories of the DSM to talk about themselves. “Exploration of inner experience has the potential to challenge the uniform and bureaucratic language of the DSM. Insofar as people use DSM categories instead of exploring the phenomena of their experience firsthand, they may have only the illusion of communicating with other people what it is like to be, say, manic” (142).

One important consequence of this is that without people telling us what it is like for them, there is a failure on the part of the rest of us to understand them as people — their conditions seem to be malfunctions rather than understandable experiences. To be able to empathize with others we first have to have a sense of what it is like for them. How are we to do this if people do not have the language with which to do it, if instead all they have is the language of the DSM?

viagra sales in uk Statins medications are prescribed for lowering cholesterol levels. It occurs loved this generico viagra on line due to blood flow into the penis keeping the erection natural when a man is sexually stimulated and has a desire to have sex. You are advised to use this herbal pill regularly two times for buying tadalafil tablets learningworksca.org 3 to 4 months. Individual Psychological Counselling Individual counseling is a effective way to treat ED- Fact Many couples still don’t understand the importance tadalafil 20mg mastercard of counseling. In Charlie Rose’s special on The Brain and Mental Illness, Elyn Saks and Kay Redfield Jamieson discussed their experiences with their own struggles with, respectively, psychosis due to schizophrenia and mania and depression due to bipolar disorder. Each credited medication with being essential to them leading the highly functional lives they lead, but they each also thought that the psychotherapy they had received, and continue to receive, had been essential to their recoveries. As Saks puts it in her memoir The Center Cannot Not Hold, “…what has allowed me to see the meaning in my struggles—to make sense of everything that happened before and during the course of my illness, and to mobilize what strengths I may possess into a rich and productive life—is talk therapy” (331). This is particularly striking in the case of Saks, who had been told that the best she could hope for given her diagnosis, would be to live in a group home and that she would never be able to support herself. Today she is a law professor at USC, with wonderful relationships, including a very happy marriage. In short, she has a highly successful and fulfilling professional and personal life. The outcomes for most people living with schizophrenia are not nearly as good. Saks believes that while medication kept her alive, psychoanalysis helped her find a life worth living (298). Both Saks and Jamieson had supportive families and the financial resources to obtain excellent psychodynamic psychotherapy. Most mentally ill people are not so fortunate.

So we have three highly functional women (successful by anyone’s standard of success), with longstanding DSM diagnoses who have been helped by something to which most people do not have access and which Martin believes “has the potential to challenge the uniform and bureaucratic language of the DSM” (142) Further, by not giving people access to psychotherapy that would allow them to explore their inner states and experience, the current system not only reinforces itself, but reinforces certain prejudices against the mentally ill — we see them as malfunctioning and unpredictable instead of understanding them as persons with particular unusual experiences that we can come to understand. All we have is what Martin calls the “dubious science of the DSM” which leaves out subjective experience altogether and in doing so denies the ethical personhood of those who fall under its diagnostic categories. Saks says, “the humanity we all share is more important than the mental illness we may not” (336). Yet denying people the resources that will allow them to develop the ability to articulate to themselves and to others what it is like to live with their experiences, as our current system does to all but the fortunate few, means that neither they nor we can have the opportunity to see that “humanity we all share.” We are left instead with the view chillingly articulated by a mental health professional quoted in Saks’ memoir who was unaware that she lived under a psychiatric diagnosis: “These people [the mentally ill] are different from you and me…It [physical restraint] doesn’t affect them the way it would affect us” (212).

Share Button

Comments

“The Humanity We All Share”: What the DSM Leaves Out — 1 Comment

  1. The problem identified here goes much deeper than the division between psychotherapy and medication management. The categorical-descriptive approach embedded in the DSM-III, IV, and 5 was originally intended to address notorious unreliability in psychiatric diagnosis and create an evidence based matrix for research and practice. Unfortunately, the nosologists and statisticians who were its architects suffered from epistemological myopia and failed from the outset to adequately incorporate what Paul McHugh called the essential “Perspectives of Psychiatry”: categories of disease (e.g. schizophrenia), dimensions (e.g. intelligence), behaviors (e.g. drug dependence), and life narrative (i.e. biography).
    The focus on categories to the exclusion of other perspectives led to structured interviews, assessment scales, and diagnostic criterion that preempted a more comprehensive engagement with the individual patient. Certainly, a prejudice against psychoanalysis infected the early formulations and relegated much of psychotherapy to psychology and social work, leaving psychiatrists with the prescription pad. The economics of managed care further constrained the parameters of treatment. However, the fundamental problem now is the preeminence of neuroscience as the epistemological reference for psychiatric research and theory. Highlighting the role of psychotherapy can help to ameliorate the problem but it is not likely to undo the damage that has been done to the field.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.