Consider a Kitchen Aid ad from 2013. In between glossy images of the mixer itself, the ability to make your own healthy food—made of quality ingredients and preservative-free—is emphasized, as is preparation skill and social activity: “…new knife skills… a fish you’ve never bought before… host Moroccan night.” Here is a similar advertisement, which includes a close-up shot of a vacuum cleaner at the very beginning which reinforces domestic labor and the domestic domain:
We will come back to the ad in a moment.
With all the hubbub about obesity in America, there is a renewed focus on everything from increasing access to fresh vegetables to making sure that kids and adults get more physical activity. Despite the many arguments that it is institutional factors such as access to poor nutrition and lack of access to physical activity at school, or built-environment factors such as outside areas in which it is physically unsafe to run or walk or play, the responsibility for health is placed intensely on individuals. In part, this is because American society is highly individualistic. This is part of the problem: that the responsibility for change is misplaced when it falls only on individuals’ shoulders. Another part is upon whose shoulders it often falls. Women—whether as mothers, wives, daughters, or partners—are far more likely than fathers to be held responsible for their family’s health status. This is chronicled in a 2010 Time article called Lady Madonna and numerous other sources. Now let’s think again about the Kitchen Aid advertisements. The only person seen preparing food is an adult woman. Men and children appear solely as consumers of the healthy, preservative-free, homemade food.
Consider now how truly misguided it is to place responsibility for nutrition, physical activity, or obesity primarily on any individual, much less disproportionately on women.
Think first of physical activity. When parents allow children to play outside unsupervised, they risk being judged to be insufficiently careful with their children’s safety with respect to injury or abduction. When they keep them inside, they can play with the children, let the children play on their own, or allow the children to take advantage of the many electronic entertainments available through computers and television. Indeed, numerous studies of physical activity indicate that safety concerns—sometimes from violent crime and sometimes from biking, walking, or running being possible only in high-traffic areas—are a significant reason that adults do not get enough physical activity of their own, for both urban, suburban, and rural populations. The problem here is a systemic issue with either crime or the built environment, not one that can be attacked by individuals and not one for which individuals can reasonably be held responsible.
Having briefly sketched the way in which women are held responsible for non-dietary aspects of the obesity epidemic, let’s consider food. Food is a massively loaded topic for women. No, this is not a pun—just Google “women dieting” and select Images to illustrate how loaded. Here are a few illustrative images.
A Caucasian woman with dark hair slicked back into a bun and elaborate makeup, wearing a clean white tank top, is holding a salad which is just green lettuce and red sliced tomatoes. She is not eating it with a fork and it appears to have no dressing or embellishment. She is holding a piece of lettuce above her mouth with her head tilted slightly back, eyes closed ecstatically. This must be the most amazing salad ever. This image illustrates a trend in such images that many folks call “women eating salad.” It is cross-cultural.
Another typical image of “women dieting” which shows a Caucasian woman with her hair pulled back in a sleeveless white shirt. An array of desserts (cakes, custards, pies, with whipped cream and glistening red cherries) lay in front of her on a table. She is turned slightly away from them, her arms are crossed in resolve and, in the event her resolve fails, her mouth is covered with a wide strip of white tape. This is typical of a sort of image which I think of as “woman denying food pleasure.” This notion is strongly associated with dieting generally: denial and self-control.
Kama means desire and sutra means a thread or levitra online a line that’s holds things together. Erectile dysfunction is a major cultural and sociological deterrent as it is directly viagra samples for free related to masculinity which in turn worsens chronic diarrhea. So say goodbye to your erectile worries & win the battle viagra sale canada by using Kamagra. Your health care expert or doctor may refer you cheap viagra check out for source to any recommendable hospital nearby your location which is well-known for Zamboni CCSVI.
A slim young Caucasian woman, with dark hair pulled back, is wearing a beige tank top and black underwear. She is crouching on a bathroom scale with a look of shock on her face, eyebrows raised, presumably in response to her weight. Doctors would classify her as of normal healthy weight. This woman is clearly worried about her body weight, alone, even though body weight alone is not a good indicator of health.
These themes—woman eating salad, woman denying food pleasure, woman worried about body weight—represent recurring ideas in dieting, which is itself heavily gendered. And they give rise to not only self-recrimination, but judgment by others as well. Overweight women seen eating apparently unhealthy foods are far more likely than overweight men or “ideal”-weight women to be publicly corrected for what they eat.
And these aspects of how loaded food is with respect to gender don’t even address holding women responsible for the diet and health of their family members. According to a 2000 article by Bianchi et al., a number of studies support the claim that married American women spend more time on housework compared to women who are not married, while most studies report little or no difference in household labor time between married and unmarried American men. In fact, men living in couples—one presumes heterosexual couples but the research was not explicit—reduced their time in housework (Bianchi et al. 197). In their original research, Bianchi et al. found that, “almost two-thirds of total housework hours are spent doing the core housework tasks of cooking and cleaning” which “all continue to be much more often the purview of women than men” (Bianchi et al. 206). And yet, children eat at least one meal a day at school, and spend half of their waking hours (nearly all their daylight hours) in school for five days a week. Significant amounts of their lives—both respect to fitness and diet—are outside the control of their mothers. Similarly, adult male husbands of heterosexual married women generally eat at least one meal a day separately from their wives and can, of their own free will, decide how to eat and whether to exercise. Again it seems that no individual can be held wholly responsible for the diet of her family members.
And now, we see a pernicious angle of all these factors, one raised by the Kitchen Aid ad with which we began: marketing has picked up on this issue, and companies use these expectations to make sales, exploiting these burdensome gendered expectations to sell more items. Americans need more physical activity. And we need to eat more healthy good and less unhealthy food. Maybe even more homemade food. But it needn’t be women who are held primarily responsible for these. And they needn’t be used to sell expensive gadgets with multiple purpose-specific limited-use attachments.
To unfairly gender such labor is one kind of unfairness, and one women have long born in the United States. What’s worse, it ignores very real institutional and built-environment constraints over which women have no control. If this is a moral demand made upon women, and environmental factors beyond women’s control are significant causes of obesity, then women are condemned to moral failure. Such demands are thus doubly unfair: both unfairly born by women, and impossible to satisfy. By all means, let us work for more exercise and better food. But let US work for it, by changing our systems and culture, by distributing what individual responsibility is appropriate across adult members of society.
Watch out for these demands in advertising, in expectations, in relationships, in public health debates, in news coverage of stories, in doctors’ recommendations, and in general. Individualization of systemic health problems costs us, in more ways than one. These individualized demands are common. And pernicious. And to be resisted.
A shorter version of this blog entry was posted in 2012 at the SIUE Women’s Studies blog where Alison Reiheld is also a regular contributor on issues beyond medical ethics including children’s Halloween costumes, feminist selfies, marriage equality, and the sartorial choices of political candidates and their spouses.
Alison Reiheld has also written on “Gender Norms and Food Behaviors” in the Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics (Springer 2014) available in print and online. There, she considers food behaviors including food production, food preparation, and food consumption.
