“The moral naivete of ethics by numbers”

Susan Dwyer (University of Maryland):

What do bioethicists do? According to a recent Boston Globe op-ed by the Harvard cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker, they needlessly get in the way of saving and improving human lives by throwing up ethical red tape and slowing the speed At this point the flow of blood resumes as http://www.donssite.com/truckphoto/Picture-of-Blue-peterbilt-stepdeck-Fergus-Truck-Show-2011.htm levitra on line normal and is no longer concentrated in the genital area. It can be examined at different level that comprises psychology and medical reason. buy cheap tadalafil Once taken, its effect can prevail from buy cheap cialis 5 to 6 hours. There are many online store usa but if you want to get branded canadian cialis generic more info here for you then you should make practice of the drugs of cialis, purchase cialis & donssite.com openly. of research, and in so doing, they undermine their right to call themselves ethicists at all.

Read on at Aljazeera America. You can also listen to her discuss this — as well the need to consider race, class, and gender in medical research — at The Majority Report.

Share Button

Comments

“The moral naivete of ethics by numbers” — 1 Comment

  1. I agree with almost every line in Dwyer’s piece. But I’d also point out that ‘bioethics’ by groupthink (e.g. mindlessly echoing whorephobic protests against the decriminalisation of sex work or jumping on the Islamophobic media bandwagon attempting to manufacture consent for the next round of US military adverturism in the middle east) just because ‘feminism’ is also pretty morally naive.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.