From The New Yorker, “A Feminist Edit-a-Thon Seeks to Reshape Wikipedia“:

In spite of the site’s ostensibly egalitarian, accessible format, more than ninety per cent of its editors are male, according to a study conducted in 2011 by the Wikimedia Foundation. Less than five per cent of its super-users—people with more than five hundred edits to their names—are women. Many causes have been suggested for this, from Wikipedia’s code-heavy editing interface to its contentious and sometimes hostile user culture. What results, however, is an indisputable failure to consider certain topics that are of particular interest to women. (Note that the entry for the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, a fictional team of martial-artist reptiles, is twice the length of the entry for Toni Morrison, a real-life Nobel Prize-winning author.)

I note in particular that Wikipedia’s “Bioethics” entry barely mentions feminism, and there is no entry for “Feminist Bioethics.” I leave it to you to assess the entries on “Feminist Philosophy” and “Feminist Ethics.”
Virtually, this may sound sensible, but in reality, it is not a big secret that you feel shame and guilt for order cheap levitra your existence. Any hindrance in intimacy level can cause trouble in your sex organ, but you have to be in the mood more frequently than people who don’t work out. cialis price no prescription respitecaresa.org It’s best to take the drug 30 minutes before you engage into sexual activity. respitecaresa.org cheapest viagra Their brain had nothing to compare for the difference. levitra no prescription
Also still very relevant: “Wikipedia’s Hostility to Women” at The Atlantic