Over at the Baltimore Sun, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Carleigh Krubiner, and Ruth Faden have penned an excellent op-ed on the need for further research on pregnant women.  They write:

Pregnant women are at the crux of Zika’s most devastating consequences. Their needs must be uppermost in Zika prevention plans. While this will not be easy, the knee-jerk response that research with pregnant women is too complex to contemplate is not acceptable.

The success rate of the medicine has price of cialis 10mg gone higher by 70%. He is the founder learn this here now levitra 60 mg of Trimex Industries. Therefore, patients would not only experience canadian pharmacy tadalafil drug resistance, side-effects, but also would experience diseases like pseudome mbranous colitis, diarrhea and so on. No one likes to fight buy viagra no prescription with their loved one, but there are many unresolved issues that are causing problems in your sex life. Current recommendations for women to delay or avoid pregnancy are unfair and unrealistic. In many areas hit hardest by Zika, women have limited access to contraception; there are, moreover, high rates of unplanned pregnancy worldwide. Preventing pregnancy may be the right course for some women, and preventing Zika in women before they get pregnant is critical. But these responses cannot be the whole answer.

You may remember that 2 of these authors–Lyerly and Faden–published a call for responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research in the second issue of our own International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, back in 2008, along with Margaret Olivia Little. Lyerly, Little, and other bioethicists also co-authored a piece in the Hastings Center Report on the way that risk is conceptualized in the treatment of pregnant women.  Both bear on this issue and you may wish to check them out as well.