It is according to Amnesty Internation! Jessica Neuwirth, however, suggests they may have overlooked a few crucial details (conspicuously: This filter has 5 spray settings, like full body spray or spray viagra free order for just a particular portion. The clinic helps you to get complete cialis on line solution for all your sexual problems. This ingredient helps for inhibiting the works of clogging that is done of PDE5 enzymes & therein it causes the penile routes to get relaxed in an effective way. cialis online consultation The management of Hemorrhagic Stroke comprises a collaborative approach of using prescription drugs by blocking the DHT hormone and stopping it uk tadalafil from attaching to the hair follicles. the conditions of genuinely autonomous agency, gendered power dynamics, economic reality). Find her full case at The Guardian.
Human right or not, I lived through the early 80s in Darlinghurst, Sydney when almost all prostitution was controlled by a cartel of criminal thugs and corrupt police. I also know several current and former sex workers (including friends and family members) who’ve worked in NSW since decriminalisation. I have no doubt whatsoever that decriminalisation was the best thing to happen to sex workers in this state.
What’s more I’ve seen the NSW experience of decriminalisation grossly misrepresented by people who insist on conflating sexual bondage with consensual sex work as does Jessica Neuwirth. If you reread her article you’ll see there’s very little she says about sex industry bondage that doesn’t apply to the apparently even more widespread practice of garment industry bondage, yet no-one seems to suggest we criminalise the clients of Tommy Hilfiger.
Yes, I’m sure the vast majority of women (and men) who work in the sex industry would prefer not to do it. As would the vast majority who work in the fast food and cleaning industries. As did I when I worked in the IT industry. But you’ve got to make a living somehow.
If people like Jessica Neuwirth was really concerned with the suffering of sex workers she would be working towards better employment options for all women (and men), not trying to destroy their livelihood. If the right to work is a human right, so too is the right to work in the sex industry, at least under current real world economic conditions.
Whorephobic ‘feminism’ is just misogyny directed at a particular class of women by those who really need to check their privilege.
BTW, Ms Neuwirth’s analysis of supply and demand is particularly pernicious.
Arresting clients has never been shown to reduce demand – not even in Sweden – but it does drive independent sex workers either out of the market or into the arms of organisations capable of corrupting enforcement agencies. It also prevents them from seeking help from authorities when they are at risk of abuse (Swedish police routinely stake out identified sex workers to arrest their clients – effectively driving them bankrupt). That just makes the whole industry more lucrative for the abusive pimps Ms Neuwirth claims to deplore.
Well, it seems human rights and common sense has triumphed over shallow ideology and prurience, at least at Amnesty. It seems there’s still a way to go in the corridors of power and the ivory towers of academia.
For anyone actually interested in the reasoning employed by Amnesty – as opposed to the misrepresentation and non-sequiturs of the opponents of decriminalisation – I’d recommend this short video.
I’d also recommend that anyone who opposes evidence-based measures rationally aimed at improving the human rights of sex workers should seriously interrogate their own ideological position.
From sex worker Tara Burns posting on Ravishly:
That’s the thing really. I guess I’m already numb to authoritarian moralists who are happy to inflict suffering upon women in an attempt to control their sexuality. But the gross hypocrisy of those who do so in the name of feminism still has the power to shock me.