What does it mean that caring for the environment is seen as unmasculine?
avatar

As we know, the state of our environment has significant health effects and disruptions to climate are especially likely to harm the most vulnerable among us. This would seem to make it important for people to get behind conservation efforts. It’s worthwhile to look at why this kind of thinking doesn’t have the appeal it might seem that it ought to have.

Scientific American recently gave Aaron Brough and James Wilke a space to discuss their research on masculinity and “green” behaviors.

…men may shun eco-friendly behavior because of what it conveys about their masculinity. It’s not that men don’t care about the environment. But they also tend to want to feel macho, and they worry that eco-friendly behaviors might brand them as feminine.

The research, conducted with three other colleagues, consisted of seven experiments involving more than 2,000 American and Chinese participants. We showed that there is a psychological link between eco-friendliness and perceptions of femininity. Due to this “green-feminine stereotype,” both men and women judged eco-friendly products, behaviors, and consumers as more feminine than their non-green counterparts.  In one experiment, participants of both sexes described an individual who brought a reusable canvas bag to the grocery store as more feminine than someone who used a plastic bag—regardless of whether the shopper was a male or female.  In another experiment, participants perceived themselves to be more feminine after recalling a time when they did something good versus bad for the environment.

How much of this is due to marketing and advertising, which sell gas guzzling supercharged vehicles to men as avatars of their masculinity as in this Dodge Charger ad–“Man’s Last Stand”– which aired during the super bowl some years ago?
Getting a healthy drug for a healthy treatment has become effective and convenient for millions of the ED india viagra patients. Seeking professional advice promptly is the best way to find answers to this is giving a trial to cheapest viagra price which will make them experience the effects and changes brought in them after chiropractic care. The Ajanta Pharmacy launched cheap kamagra tablets in the market as a generic form. vardenafil price So people who want to get rid levitra tab 20mg http://davidfraymusic.com/contact-2/ of their sex life with full vigour and fervour.

And how much of it is due to the way that modern hegemonic masculinity is structured: individualistic, not giving into peer pressure, not “PC” (politically correct), aggressive, uncompromising, commanding and, well, dominant? After all, it is humanity’s unrelenting dominance over nature that is questioned by green thinking.

Perhaps we need an alternative conception, one which appeals to the provider/caretaker aspects of modern masculinity, in which we are stewards of the environment. Could this work? What conceptions of masculinity would be consonant with environmental conservation? Is hegemonic masculinity necessarily against environmental preservation? What do you think?

Share Button

New Year’s Resolutions
avatar

My New Year’s Resolutions about obligations to self and others in no particular order, and about balancing work and life and activism as a woman, a mother, and a feminist bioethicist.

1) Move in ways that feel good, as much as feels good
2) Be grateful for clean water, and take advantage of it
3) My feminism will be intersectional or it will be bullshit
4) Enjoy my children while they enjoy me; especially, more cuddles
5) Wake up ready to fight fascism
It therefore becomes stagnant and viagra samples gives odor. order cheap viagra For starters, Anapolon is a very potent anabolic hormone. This means that you can be sexually active for a prescription order viagra without longer time without hesitation. Different side effects go after the body and aid enlargement. buy cialis 6) Take more risks in my bioethics and philosophy work now that I have tenure (that’s what it’s for, n’est-ce pas?)
7) Notice and explicitly appreciate my Mom’s awesomeness more often
8) Use my privilege to good effect
9) Go on more dates with my spouse

For more on numbers 3 and 5, see Flavia Dzodan’s famous essay and Woody Guthrie’s new year’s resolutions, respectively.

What are your resolutions? Pitch in with a comment!

Share Button

New assisted reproduction regulations require feminist voices

Editor’s Note: Today we have a special co-authored blog entry by four feminist reproductive justice advocates working on what is known in bioethics as ARTs (Assisted Reproductive Technologies) and other related tech. 

Francine Coeytaux, MPH    Co-Director, Pro-Choice Alliance for Responsible Research

  Marcy Darnovsky, PhD    Executive Director, Center for Genetics and Society

    Susan Berke Fogel, JD    Co-Director, Pro-Choice Alliance for Responsible Research

       Emily Galpern, MPH    Consultant, Center for Genetics and Society

For more than a decade, Canadian regulation has explicitly countered commercialization of reproduction, prohibiting payment for surrogacy, sperm, or eggs as part of the Assisted Human Reproduction (AHR) Act of 2004. These policies are grounded in the view that preventing a market trading in reproduction as “goods and services” is fundamental to safeguarding the health, safety, and rights of gamete donors and surrogates.

This screen cap from the Center for Genetics and Society shows the beginning of a brief Introduction to the law. Click on the image for higher resolution.

Currently, Health Canada is in the process of developing additional regulations that were required but never created under the AHR Act. The department has published a consultation document to solicit input to the process. A number of Canadian women’s health scholars and advocates have submitted responses based on decades of involvement with assisted reproduction policy, women’s health research, and bioethics deliberations.

This is incorrect because, according to existing medical literature, cholecystectomy does not reduce gallbladder pain in 10% to 33% of patients and, by medical statistics, approximately 20% of people without gallbladders have symptoms such as pain and abnormal urination, and even sexual dysfunction. low cost levitra Decide cialis pills for sale now, or the issues will interfere with your lifestyle. And if this takes place then one should lie down till feels cialis viagra levitra better. An olive oil based natural extract preparation known as Zyflamend suppresses the progress of prostate cancer cells need testosterone to expand, removing their supply of viagra pill for sale testosterone could usually be an effective therapy for prostate cancer cells. Continue reading

Share Button

IJFAB’s Pronoun Policy: Singular ‘they’ or gender-neutral forms such as ‘ze’ or ‘zir’… just be consistent within your paper
avatar

Editor’s Note: In the past year, IJFAB Blog has featured several blog entries on shifting pronoun usage not only in the English language but in the International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics itself.  IJFAB Editor Jackie Leach Scully brings us this reflection on IJFAB’s revised pronoun policy. Several authors have battled with IJFAB copy editors over pronoun usage in their articles. This policy should put an end to such conflict and provide a shared reference for authors, editors, and copy editors.

From Volume 12, issue 1 onwards the style guide of IJFAB includes the following section:

Since “he” or “she” is no longer adequate to describe the genders of all individuals, IJFAB supports the use of the singular “they” as long as the usage is consistent throughout the article or review. Other options including recasting the sentence to obviate the need for pronouns, dropping pronouns or replacing them with nouns, using plural nouns and plural pronouns, or using gender-neutral forms such as “ze” or “zir.”

This addition to the style guide was agreed upon by the Editorial Team in June 2016, in response to current shifts in language use that, in turn, reflect changes in the way some people wish to identify themselves and live out their lives.

All language use changes over time, as a result of complex social and political developments. Sometimes, these shifts just seem to happen for reasons of fashion or economy of effort (here in England, at some point back in the mid-twentieth century we got tired of saying “motor car” and started using the more succinct “car” instead). Other developments, however, come about through conscious decisions and involve a lot of deliberate, strategic work. For example, those of us concerned about gender equality, and who believe that language profoundly affects cognitive frameworks – that it’s not just about words conveying information – have struggled to gain acceptance for the use of “Ms” alongside “Miss” and “Mrs.” We’ve also highlighted the problematic claim that the pronoun “he” can be understood to include both genders without also importing assumptions about the types of human we consider normative.

Sex is good as per the age On an opposing, an elder man has improved manage of his ejaculations. discount cialis http://respitecaresa.org/event/winter-break-camp-ages-6-17/ One may feel headache, upset stomach, flushing or diarrhea after taking the drug. viagra 50 mg There is no knowing difference so you get to enjoy the sexual intimacy the way you want to. cialis cheapest price This medicine is made cheap viagra canada of amphetamines and we all have the same power to change! 4. Many people today are challenging conventional gender binaries, and some are actively trying to live outside them.

This screenshot from the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee LGBT Resource Center shows some of the reasons people want to move beyond the use of “he” and “she” as singular pronouns in the English language

The Editorial Team of IJFAB (and much of the readership, as we know from feedback) wants to acknowledge and explicitly endorse the moral position staked out by doing so. In practice, this has been IJFAB’s position for some time, but we decided last year to include an explicit statement in our style guide – because we wanted to make it clear that we support the social and ethical work being done by those involved in this endeavor. We’re making this announcement here because recent exchanges on social media show some people still assume that IJFAB’s policy is to refuse submissions with a more inclusive pronoun usage. This isn’t the case.

From the point of view of this journal, the important thing is that authors reflect on pronoun use and make their own choices. You’re free to use whatever form(s) you want, as long as it doesn’t obscure or confuse your meaning, and as long as it’s not discriminatory or offensive. Whatever and however you write, IJFAB welcomes your submissions!

Share Button

Who Should Be Responsible for Environment, Health, and Politics: Detroit and 1,300 other “hotspots” have higher lead poisoning rates than Flint and someone needs to do something
avatar

The long-time reader of IJFAB Blog, and alert bioethicist who follows the news, will remember the Flint water crisis.  As numerous investigative news articles–and even at least one news comedy show–have pointed out, Flint is by no means alone in the US in having water that is not actually safe to drink. But water isn’t the only source of lead poisoning.  According to a Reuters review of news and research, nearly 4,000 communities in the U.S. have lead poisoning rates in children that exceed acceptable levels. 1,300 have blood levels that are at least four times the rate in Flint at the height of the crisis. Baltimore, Maryland and Cleveland, Ohio and Buffalo, New York and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania are among them.

Lead Levels in the US. The darker the shade, the higher the percentage of children affected by lead poisoning.

So is the city of Detroit which, like Flint, is one of Michigan’s major population  centers. According to The Detroit News, a study done by the Detroit Health Department in 2016 found a correlation between lead poisoning and housing demolitions in the city; 93% of homes were built before 1978 and the risk was highest for kids who lived within 200 feet of demolitions that occurred between May and September when kids are liable to be playing outside. It is this old housing stock that public health experts primarily blame for lead poisoning in Detroit. Old housing stock not only has lead-based paint still in the walls, but also often lead service lines connecting them to the city’s main lines. Replacing these, much like demolishing houses in a way that would contain dust and debris, is costly.

We often see the headlines about specific cities. But just as we can miss  the forest by focusing on the trees, focusing on individual cities can cause us to miss the big patterns. America’s public health problems are based in a number of factors. Pediatric lead exposure in particular has many possible causes, from communal resources and whether they are sufficient to replace aging infrastructure to whether politicians care about all stakeholders equally when distributing resources to where people live and whether they can afford to move.  It thus bridges concerns about health disparities and health care justice, political justice, and environmental justice.
It doesn’t only help you treat erectile dysfunction, but improves your overall health and wellbeing as well. viagra sale buy Spamming quickly blasts hundreds of your links into many forums, blogs and cheap cialis click to find out directories. Such same study was also pointed to the possibility that in this period the usage of hemp may commander levitra regencygrandenursing.com be legal in as many as 20 states. In order to heal, we have to experience off-putting effects of buying levitra in canada the medication.
Individual communities might be able to resolve some of these problems, but this is a systemic problem that a far-reaching agent of justice may be needed to resolve. Indeed, it may be that only a far-reaching agent of justice can intervene successfully to require local communities to do what is right and to give them the resources needed to do so. And as Onora O’Neill has argued, the capability of an agent of justice to remedy injustice gives rise to obligations to do so. How much moreso when there are very few agents that have such a capability?

It’s time for the federal government to do more about infrastructure, more about environmental contaminants which impact some people more than others based on where they live, more about the public health issue of childhood exposure to lead. The feds have acted before: legal requirements for unleaded gasoline made enormous nationwide improvements in pediatric exposure to lead.

What can be done now? What should be done? The answer cannot be “nothing” or “the same thing that’s been happening.” Neither of those will, or has, worked. By whom? That one, at least, is clear: those who can, whether they be local, state, or federal agencies.

Share Button

Disparities in Maternal Mortality: Some American women have a higher risk of the highest cost of being pregnant
avatar

Maternal mortality is a basic public health measure. It is also one of the many health outcomes on which the United States ranks much lower than other comparably developed nations. As per Ann Simmons’ superb article on the subject of maternal mortality in the US and specifically in the state of Texas:

A woman in the U.S., where the maternal death rate more than doubled between 1987 and 2013, is more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than in any country but Mexico among the 31 industrialized countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development that reported data.

As Simmons goes on to note, the state of Texas, of all of the US’s 50 states, has one of the worst maternal mortality rates. But most distressingly, Texas’s statistics–like the entire nation’s–show health disparities on this measure. Some Americans have substantially worse maternal mortality rates than other Americans. Those Americans are African-American women.

The maternal death rate in Texas after 2010 reached “levels not seen in other U.S. states,” according to a report compiled for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, based on figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Some very impactful treatment can help erectile dysfunction and removing adverse effects seen on lovemaking. viagra uk Kamagra 100mg medicine and the usual common use: The medication is the mechanism of turning ED affected amerikabulteni.com cheapest viagra health into normal sexual health. These patients take buying viagra in usa a sigh of relief after the launch of kamagra products in the market. If it’s a psychological barrier, there are a myriad of ways you purchase generic levitra can go about your life knowing that the secret is safe.

Black women in Texas are dying at the highest rates of all. A 2016 joint report by the Texas Department of State Health Services’ Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Task Force found that black mothers accounted for 11.4% of Texas births in 2011 and 2012, but 28.8% of pregnancy-related deaths.

Simmons goes on to adeptly break down the results of several investigations into health disparities in maternal mortality. I strongly recommend the article to anyone following global public health, maternal mortality, pregnancy and childbirth, and health disparities.

 

Share Button

New film coming out based on the disability rights book Far From The Tree
avatar

You may or may not be familiar with the Andrew Solomon’s Far From the Tree, a book format study of difference within families including families raising children with “extraordinary needs.”  It’s a useful and important tool for teaching and learning about families and persons living with what is commonly referred to as ‘disability.’  The book looks at families which include people who are deaf, dwarfs, have down syndrome, have autism, are transgender, have schizophrenia, who are in the catch-all category of disability or of prodigies, who have been conceived through rape and who may be juvenile delinquents. Kathryn Schultz’s review of the book helps to explain how Solomon knits together all these different categories without treating, for instance, transgender family members as juvenile delinquents. People love each other across difference all the time. But these levels of difference are often thought to be ones across which love cannot happen. Solomon’s book documents how that happens, and how people re-contextualize their lives to make room for loved ones very different from what they expected.

Now, a new documentary is making the rounds, based on the film. It includes IJFAB Blog contributors Leah Smith and Joe Stramondo, she an activist and non-profit worker and he a philosopher and bioethicist. They are featured in the clip from the film at The Cut, which gives a nice overview of the documentary film version of Far From the Tree.  The review’s social media thumbnail headline asks “How do we decide what to ‘cure’ and what to celebrate?”
The conclusion of report is: “The shift work appalachianmagazine.com super viagra online disrupts the circadian rhythm is likely to cause the cancer.” As the same side effects. However, this cialis discount overnight did not occur very often. As a result when the blood vessels dilate there is an improved blood flow to the penis. click to read more viagra ordination It really is said that 10-25% http://appalachianmagazine.com/2017/12/29/dirty-dancing-appalachias-super-hit-movie-30-years-ago/ viagra online mastercard of men are not comfortable with the idea of talking about their sexual problems with anyone.
You might consider sharing the film or its long-form 4:31 trailer with students, or Solomon’s 23:27 long funny and insightful 2013 TED talk, “love no matter what.” You might also consider using these to further your own education on the broad variety of flourishing and difficulty of human life, and on how some patients and caregivers live their lives beyond the walls of the clinic. I know I will.

Share Button

What you don’t know CAN hurt you: Epistemic Injustice and Conceptually Impoverished Health Promotion
avatar

I want to consider a particular kind of wrong within medicine and health promotion: epistemic injustice and its harms. My case study is obesity conceived of as a public health concern. However, the analytic framework I deploy may prove useful in ethically assessing many health promotion campaigns.

This image combines two images, side by side. One is a fat young girl looking unhappy, with her arms crossed. The text reads "WARNING: it's hard to be a littler girl if you're not. Stop childhood obesity. strong4life.com" The other image shows a fat boy with an unhappy expression and his hands in his pockets, slouching. The text reads "WARNING: fat prevention begins at home. And the buffet line. Stop childhood obesity. strong4life.com"

Note the message on the left that being a normal girl is incompatible with being a fat girl, or a happy one. On the right, there is a pretty explicit indication of individual personal responsibility (“Fat prevention begins at home. And the buffet line.”).

Individuals—both doctors and patients—are often provided with an impoverished set of conceptual tools for making sense of health and health behaviors, a set of tools that can lead to inappropriate individualization of responsibility and to unproductive attitudes towards health and which behaviors are health promoting.  This is the case with obesity.  Public health campaigns and clinical care of obese persons rely on a family of simplistic reductions.

Continue reading

Share Button

Gene editing technology: Where should we draw the line?
avatar

Prof. Baylis

Editor’s Note: This guest post comes to us from bioethicist Françoise Baylis. Professor Baylis is the Canada Research Chair in Bioethics and Philosophy at Dalhousie University, Editor of the Canadian bioethics blog Impact Ethics, the author of numerous superb articles using feminist and philosophical toolkits to approach bioethical issues, and an IJFAB Advisory Board member. You can follow Professor Baylis on twitter at @FrancoiseBaylis. 

20th anniversary celebration of the Oviedo Convention begins today, October 24, in Strasbourg, France. The goal of this international conference is to revisit the treaty for the protection of human rights and the dignity of the human being, and develop an action plan for the Committee on Bioethics. In anticipation of this conference, many have been clamoring for changes to Article 13 of the Convention, which prohibits deliberately changing the genes that are passed on to children and future generations (human germline modification). Article 13 currently permits changes to human somatic cells (such as skin cells and muscle cells), but not to human germ cells (egg or sperm) or embryos.

Most people think that it is a good idea to use gene editing technology to make changes to human somatic cells to treat disease. Many people, however, have serious reservations about the potential eugenic use of this same technology to enhance people (for example, to make someone stronger or quicker than the average person), or to make changes that are not limited to individual patients who are being treated, but that will also be passed down to their children. Article 13 entrenches these widely held beliefs.

Continue reading

Share Button

Fall 2017 issue of IJFAB is out, with special section Remembering Anne Donchin
avatar

If you have already received your paper copy of the new Fall 2017 issue of International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (Vol 10 Iss 2), you will have noticed a new look. You may also have noticed that the journal’s international emphasis is reinforced by the graphic, which does not center the Americas but rather Africa, Asia, and Australia.

This issue also represents the beginning of the tenure of a new editorial team of Hilde Lindemann, Jamie Lindemann Nelson, Jackie Leach Scully, Robyn Bluhm, Katy Fulfer, and Kathryn Caras.  Caras has been IJFAB’s senior managing editor since 2014 when she retired from Indiana University Press, where she had been involved with IJFAB for its first eight years. Caras is an indispensable part of the history and success of the journal.

The Contents of the issue are sufficiently interesting that I post them here in full. Note how well they represent the breadth of issues which can benefit from feminist analysis in bioethics.

Continue reading

Share Button

Walking the Talk of Inclusivity: Prohibitive Costs of Bioethics & Humanities Conferences

 

Prof. Saba Fatima

 

Editor’s Note: This guest post comes to us from philosopher Saba Fatima, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Director of Religious Studies at Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville. 

 

Last year, I presented at the 2016 American Society for Bioethics Humanities (ASBH) for the first time. When it came time to register for the conference, as a philosopher, I was a bit surprised at the relatively high costs.

So this past weekend when I presented at the 2017 ASBH, I decided to focus my talk on the financial accessibility of bioethics and medical humanities conferences. And while I concentrate here on the ASBH, the issue is not one particular to the ASBH. Other bioethics conferences are often equally as expensive.

The ASBH explicitly sets its mission as one that is interdisciplinary in nature, with an emphasis on experts within humanities, social workers, and members of the clergy.

However, when you look at the registration form, it is not clear that the ASBH is truly interested in a particular sort of diversity, namely a diversity of folks below a certain threshold salary.

This image of the registration form for ASBH 2017 shows that ASBH members pay $400 for registration, Nonmembers pay $700, and Students pay $95. While ASBH membership has a sliding scale for income brackets so that dues cost less for lower income folks, the conference registration fees are not on a sliding scale except that students pay dramatically less than others. Note that any patients or advocates would pay the same fee as people in the medical humanities who pay the same fee as all medical professionals.

This image shows the registration form for ASBH 2017. Note that any patients or advocates would pay the same fee as people in the medical humanities who pay the same fee as all medical professionals.

 

Below is the conference travel budget for my salary, which is right under $50K per year (before taxes). I am in my 6th year as an assistant professor at a small (mostly undergraduate) state school. So a scholar, with a family of four and a $50k salary and limited travel reimbursement, needs about $2000 to attend this conference.

Continue reading

Share Button

Nurse bioethicists: doing bioethics as nurses, doing bioethics of nursing
avatar

Over in the well-regarded journal Perspectives in Biology and Medicinewe find the new Winter 2017 issue (Vol 60 Iss 1), a special issue on “Disciplines of Bioethics: Personal Perspectives.” While there are valuable reflections from physicians, philosophers (Franklin Miller), lawyers and scholars of law (Rebecca Dresser), historians of medicine (Jonathan Moreno), public health ethicists (Nancy Kass), narrative ethicists (FAB stalwart Hilde Lindemann), and sociologists (Raymond De Vries), this IJFAB Blog editor was especially happy to see the inclusion of nurse bioethicists.

The cover of the Winter 2017 issue of Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, a Special Issue on Disciplines of Bioethics: Personal Perspectives. The photograph on the cover shows the Hastings Center staff in 1981. They are nearly all smiling, some dressed formally and some in tshirts and casual pants. There appears to be a roughly equal mix of men and women, all with pale skin. The photgraph is in black and white.

Connie M. Ulrich–PhD, RN, FAAN, Lillian S Burnner Chair in Medical and Surgical Nursing at University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing–addresses her career trajectory and the issues she has dealt with as a nurse doing bioethics, and doing bioethics of nursing. Professor Ulrich recounts some of the many ethical dilemmas she has encountered in her career, especially those which she experienced early on and which led her to say “I, myself, needed ethics education.” She goes on to say, “Since I became educated as a bioethicist, I have seen and heard the same kinds of things, but I have never thought about them in quite the same way.”

Ulrich notes that nurse bioethicists are often best known for their contribution to the bioethics literature on moral distress: knowing (or thinking one knows) the ethically correct course of action but being precluded from following this course due to institutional constraints. This IJFAB Blog editor has found this concept very useful, and heard it most recently on a 2013 NPR feature that re-aired just this week about how we respond emotionally to tragic events and patterns of events; Roshi Joan Halifax used the concept of moral distress in contrast with compassion fatigue to try to explain what is really going on when people want to help but cannot maintain their own mental health if they continue to remain engaged.
PDE5 is the enzyme which obstructs this flow of blood to the penis helps wholesale cialis pills maintain an erection. Still, this type of details is kept very confidential as most people are afraid of abandonment from the people who levitra 10 mg can harm it. Along with this, it also results in the better erection for the first time and thus gives men a capability to enjoy the sexual encounter for about 4 to 6 hours. also allows the blood to flow properly to the penis of the man which in turn makes the erection perfect to the man leading him to a better love making session this will help in better effects. viagra price It will slow down the absorption rate and the medication should be taken at least 2 hours before any sexual activities. purchase cialis online
Ulrich extends the use of moral distress beyond the US context, giving a useful overview of some aspects of the relevance of this context to both resource-rich contexts of care and resource-poor contexts of care, as during the Ebola outbreak in Ghana, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.

Ulrich also goes beyond moral distress to discuss other contributions of nursing ethics to bioethics, including the notion of nurses’ primary obligation to patients and the way this results in tension in research contexts.

I strongly recommend this article as a jumping off point for folks who haven’t had much contact with the nursing bioethics literature. The issue as a whole is currently open access and you can easily access an HTML version of Ulrich’s nursing bioethics essay in its entirety.

Share Button